Penalty to Rangers , Correct Decision !
Apr 1, 2024 19:43:18 GMT
TrueBritJack, BigBlu, and 2 more like this
Post by wlgers4ever on Apr 1, 2024 19:43:18 GMT
After listening to the debate and the reaction to our penalty on Saturday, I would just like to point out to the two Rangers haters McFadden and Stewart and two of our own , supposedly, Dodds and McCann that it was a stonewall penalty and all the mitigation about intent , or needing your arms to jump or the Hibs player not even looking doesn`t mean a thing. He went up with his arms high and flailing and smashed Souttar in the face.
It was a foul which would have been a foul anywhere else in the pitch , and as such is a penalty .There is no higher threshold in the box and for me the only real debate is whether the defender should have been booked or not. For all the reasons they state maybe THAT was a bit harsh but not the award of the penalty itself.
I am sick to death with these morons getting air time to promote a conspiracy theory narrative by blatantly ignoring the facts. The ones we don`t get (at Killie for example ) are never highlighted so there is no balance . The mainstream media which should be informative are just behaving like bloggers trying to attract likes by being controversial.
I reckon only really the McCausland one at Livvy was dodgy but instead we get this continued story about the number of pens we have got and the implication that most were undeserved just because these twats dispute even ones like this and the Sterling one at Easter Road .
Interesting that almost every one , including Saturdays , is agreed with, when reviewed on Ref Watch by an ex English referee who looks at it without the anti Rangers bias we get from the pundits up here, especially the ones that the Scottish Beeb decide to use every week. Its obvious they are not giving their expert views as ex players but rather they are letting their bias show in an attempt to be controversial and stay relevant.
It was a foul which would have been a foul anywhere else in the pitch , and as such is a penalty .There is no higher threshold in the box and for me the only real debate is whether the defender should have been booked or not. For all the reasons they state maybe THAT was a bit harsh but not the award of the penalty itself.
I am sick to death with these morons getting air time to promote a conspiracy theory narrative by blatantly ignoring the facts. The ones we don`t get (at Killie for example ) are never highlighted so there is no balance . The mainstream media which should be informative are just behaving like bloggers trying to attract likes by being controversial.
I reckon only really the McCausland one at Livvy was dodgy but instead we get this continued story about the number of pens we have got and the implication that most were undeserved just because these twats dispute even ones like this and the Sterling one at Easter Road .
Interesting that almost every one , including Saturdays , is agreed with, when reviewed on Ref Watch by an ex English referee who looks at it without the anti Rangers bias we get from the pundits up here, especially the ones that the Scottish Beeb decide to use every week. Its obvious they are not giving their expert views as ex players but rather they are letting their bias show in an attempt to be controversial and stay relevant.
